Putting the council under a (friendly) microscope

At the last meeting of the borough council Executive, it was agreed to proceed with a ‘Peer Challenge’. Briefly, this is an informal ‘review’ by staff from other councils. The review “includes a focus on leadership, governance, corporate capacity and financial resilience”.. The review results in a written report.

Of course, the Eye fully supports the idea, though we have two niggling thoughts. Will a group of peers put any serious criticisms, particularly of management, in writing without first ‘toning them down’? Secondly, the ‘terms of reference’ of the previous review – seven years ago – seem to have been influenced by the Chief Executive. But, as any magician knows, to trick an audience, you encourage it to look in one direction while the real deceipt is carried out elsewhere. Hmm. That doesn’t seem good on principle.

But what matters to the Eye is whether the previous report had any direct visible consequences for Camberley. In particular, this lengthy extract: “The priority [goal] of Camberley town centre regeneration is a huge project, which carries a high level of risk. It will need a great deal of advance preparatory work to structure a financial package that the Council can commit to and provide partners with the evidence to ensure they have confidence that the regeneration scheme is viable and will proceed. It will be important to evidence what options are available to the Council, and what risks have been assessed, if the proposed development falters and/or retail partners pull out. For example, the principal focus to date is of an anchor store underpinning the development. However, discussions with this store have been ongoing for six years and a positive response is still awaited. The timescales for implementation are also ambitious bearing in mind the number of significant interdependencies, which reinforces the point made earlier about improved arrangements for project/programme management.”

It’s not too difficult to read between the lines of that extract. Sadly, we suspect that few residents – looking at the London Road Block in particular – would regard the regeneration project as having been a success.

A lesser matter. Quote: “Once the operation of the Theatre is made more efficient, that is subsidy is reduced, options could be developed to consider transfer of ownership/operation.” We assume that ‘options could be developed’ actually means ‘sell’. Which hasn’t happened?

So, we wonder whether the previous Challenge resulted in an action plan to pursue its recommendations. If not, shouldn’t it have? More importantly, will the next Challenge do so? And will it be made public?

A final word. For many years, the Eye has criticised the council’s public documents. Less than three months ago, commenting on the draft Local Plan, we wrote: “the waffle and unsuitability of the document for a public consultation. We reckon, subjectively, that it could have been reduced by a third, and made clearer at the same time”

It seems clear that the last Challenge also thought the council should do better: “it would advantageous to set out…. a template for report writing, with guidance on length and format.” We wouldn’t mind betting that this hasn’t been done.

6 thoughts on “Putting the council under a (friendly) microscope

  1. One assumes that whilst some “peers” are assessing SHBC some staff from SHBC are equally engaged assessing another council. Whilst all this goes on is it any wonder they have no time for the day job? I despair of SHBC ever implementing an effective plan for the London Road – how delusional must you be to spend 6 years “negotiating” with a potential anchor store – just flatten it, plant some grass and trees and let us look at something vaguely attractive.

      • The council wants to put blocks of flats there – two being fifteen stories high. No way will it abandon the financial return on its ‘investment’ in the site for the sake of a pleasant patch of green.

  2. Where is Camberley going!!
    Had to go into Camberley today with hubby, ..have recently been to Bracknell, Southwold in Suffolk and Bury St Edmunds and Wroxham in Norfolk ..Footfall good ..Anchor stores and pretty clean re pavements..Have to say that Camberley town centre NOW is the dirtiest place I have ever lived in and have lived here for 42 years .An old lady (I am also old) nearly reversed into me on the pavement up from WH Smiths ,trying to negotiate a free parking space..ticked her off ..she was not disabled ..watched her walk out of her car, am so annoyed that I did not take a photo. She knew she was on the pavement and said “ I know am trying to park”
    When will SHBC come to their senses and only allow disabled folks and deliveries on to the High Street..Knoll Road CP is cheap..pretty filthy though and the lifts are not good.

    • It is annoying when someone with a disabled badge walks away from their car apparently as easily as anyone else. But we are reminded that not all disabilities are visible. But yes, the pavements are getting disgustingly food-stained. And Main Square Car Park stairwells are so unpleasant and – two of them, at least – insanitary that we don’t park there any longer, unless we really have to.

      • Knoll Road is also grim…and the bays are very small ,even for a Fiesta when a Chelsea tractor parks either side and you struggle to get into your car…

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.