Camberley regeneration

We went to the meeting in the council chamber that was chaired by the Camberley Society last night.  There were three topics on the agenda;  here we’ll summarise mainly what was said about the regeneration of the town.  Needless to say this is a lengthy item.

Firstly, though, we should give our opinion of what was said.  Basically, the occasion was very positive, with lots of good things in prospect for the town.  If only the council hadn’t spent so many years saying positive things, but not delivering them, we’d have been quite enthusiastic by the end of the evening.  As it is, our enthusiasm is tempered by what’s not gone before.  Let’s hope that this time it’ll be different.

Mrs Whelan, the Chief Executive, explained that in the past, lack of ownership by the council had meant that it could not deliver what it wanted in the town.  That has now changed, with the acquisition of the Mall.  Also, as the council doesn’t have to achieve the same financial return as a commercial company, it can do things that the previous owner could not justify.

Acquiring the Mall and associated property inevitably required significant borrowing.  And, inevitably, it involved some risk, though this was regarded as outweighed by the benefits.  Also,  though the acquisition was made primarily to aid regeneration, it would also provide a net £1.3million a year for the council to spend as it wished.  Initially, some of this would be reinvested in the town, but it would also be used to help improve other services across the borough.

It had been agreed that some £8 million would be spent on refurbishing the Mall, starting with Grace Reynolds Walk this summer/early autumn.  The whole Mall should be refurbished by about October 2018.  Rebranding – what the Mall will look like and what it will be called – will begin once the refurbishing starts.

Mrs Whelan outlined plans for Ashwood House.  These have been seen and discussed here before;  our initial impression is, sadly, of a large greenhouse helicoptered onto the existing brick building to produce 116 dwellings for sale.  New to us was the proposal that the car park currently level 3A of Main Square car park would become an amenity space for residents.  The artist’s impression shown of this was quite attractive.  (We smiled, though, at the prediction that a planning application would be submitted in the next couple of months.  This is the second time that the council’s timing of the application has slipped.)

A further (long-standing) aim of the council is to improve the environment in the High Street.  Mrs Whelan acknowledged that this wouldn’t be of any financial benefit to the council, but it was investment in the town.  The likely spend was £3.5 million or a little more, to improve the street scene.  The intention was not to pedestrianise the road, but to give pedestrians priority.  In the meantime, the council had established a matched-funding scheme to help retailers improve their shop frontages.  (We have to say that the artist’s impression shown to illustrate the council’s plans for the High Street was, like others in recent years, quite misleading.  The only vehices in it were in the far distance – giving the impression that the road would be virtually traffic-free, which doesn’t seem to be the intention.)

Finally as far as regeneration was concerned, was the London Road Block.  Mrs Whelan explained that a mixed use development of high architectural merit was the target.  An outline planning application for this was anticipated for the end of this calendar year.

Mrs Whelan then turned to last winter’s successful ice rink and the recent International Festival.  We got the impression that the ice rink wouldn’t be repeated in the same form, and that whether any alternative would be implemented this coming winter was uncertain.  The International Festival – and its final Carnival – had proved very popular, with people saying that Camberley should have more such events.

Not to be overlooked, those at the meeting were urged to take advantage of the late night Thursdays shopping scheme which would start on 6th July, and would include cheap parking.  See www.camberleyshopping.co.uk for more details


Maybe we’ll write about the rest of the meeting in a few days time….  Including what was said about Camberley’s train service, and the Q and A session that followed the presentations.

Advertisements

20 thoughts on “Camberley regeneration

  1. I so admire your resilience in attending these gatherings and suspect you attend more in hope than expectation. I’m afraid after all the promises that have been broken (with no apologies as far as I’m aware) these regurgitated offerings are meaningless. The truth is Bracknell has stolen a march on Camberley and shoppers will soon be flooding there. Having lived here for 10 years and seen no real change or improvement in that time that can be laid at Surrey Heath’s door my expectations are zero. So sad to be thinking that way of the town you live in. Come the revolution……

    • Sadly, Alan, you’re pretty much right. Though I don’t blame the council for ‘everything’, I’m not impressed by what it achieves – or fails to achieve – where it does have control. It does seem to view its own performance through rose-coloured glasses; apologies – or even explanations – have been few and far between in the past.

  2. Thank you for this update David. Most interesting.

    The idea that SHBC, who own Ashwood House, has to submit Planning Applications for this and other properties it owns is just a little strange! Judge and Jury all in one place.

    Cheers,

    Ian McLaughlin

    • Many thanks, Ian. As you know, I’m not an expert in this matter at all, but I’ve recently discovered that there are national ‘rules’ to which an authority has to comply when it’s both judge and jury. In particular, it can’t treat a planning application as confidential in such cases (no doubt I’ve distorted the position here, but it’s interesting to know that there ‘rules’ at all).

    • I appreciate your comments! But the presentation about transport that followed the regeneration talk was a bit ‘messy’, and the final presentation about health isn’t something that the Eye takes much interest in. So there’ll be a pause for reflection…

  3. Sounds great on paper but if it’s all still pound shops and “fashion” shops no-one’s ever heard of then forget it – I’ll carry on travelling to Kingston and Guildford for my shopping trips.

    • I suppose we get what we deserve. Our pound and cheap fashion shops are well-supported, of course, even if they’re not everyone’s cup of tea, and even if they don’t really fit the council’s plan to go ‘up market’. The challenge for the council is whether it really will succeed in its plans. Its track record isn’t that great.

      • I take your point, but it doesn’t really explain the proliferation of food chains such as Bill’s, Prezzo, Wagamama’s which presumably are also well supported. I think it’s more a case of you get what you’re given.

      • Perhaps it’s a bit of each, Suzie. One of my criticisms of the plans for the High Street – and I’ve said them face-to-face with the council – is that by allowing traffic the council is encouraging fast food restaurants and take always. I’ve nothing against either, but the proposed up market town isn’t the best place for them.

  4. I attended also….brilliant synopsis David…. and now appreciate what a mammoth task the council has taken on after their purchase! My question was read our re the boarded up eyesore adjacent to Kings Court and I was deeply disappointed that the council does not know who owns the land and cannot do anything at all to smarten it up as the law now stands. Apart from being a car park I have no idea what revenue could come from this land for the owner.. Pembroke House has been owned, I think , by the council for many years and yet nothing had moved on there.. I fear your comments on the Main Square car park were not fully appreciated…

    • I think the council does know a little about the ownership of those properties, Shirley, if not the detail. (I had a quiet conversation after the meeting.) I looked into the ownership of the former magistrates court myself a little while ago; it was an ‘if, but and maybe’ process, but I did make some progress. Perhaps I’ll try to do the same for Kings Court.

  5. Steve, it was described as ‘retail, residential and car park’ As yet, it seems to be little more than a concept – though I’ve been predicting the car park for years.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s